AI Citation Checker — Detect Fake References from ChatGPT & Claude

Large language models fabricate academic references: real-sounding titles, plausible authors, journals that exist — for papers that don't. EvalCite checks every reference against 8 scholarly databases (CrossRef, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, DBLP, arXiv, OpenLibrary, Google Books, plus IEEE Xplore and Scopus with keys) and flags the ones no database can confirm. Free, no signup, no character limits.

Try it now — free
Free. No signup. No character limits. Verify your entire reference list in one go.
Open the citation checker

Why AI chatbots invent citations

LLMs generate text by predicting plausible continuations, not by looking papers up. Asked for references, a model reproduces the shape of a citation — a title in the field's style, well-known author names, a real journal, a year — without any underlying record. Audits of AI-assisted manuscripts consistently find fabricated or corrupted references, and reviewers increasingly check bibliographies before reading a word of the argument.

How EvalCite catches them

1. Parse

Your list is split into individual references and each is parsed into structured fields — title, authors, year, venue, DOI, arXiv ID. Numbered lists, author-year (APA/Chicago) lists, and BibTeX files are all handled.

2. Verify

Each reference is looked up concurrently in all 8 databases and the best-matching record wins.

3. Verdict

Verified means a real record matches. Mismatch means a similar paper exists but details differ — the classic signature of an AI citing a real paper with invented metadata. Not found means nothing close exists in any database: for AI-generated text, that almost always means fabrication.

The patterns we see in AI-hallucinated references

Frequently asked questions

Can EvalCite check references written by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Copilot?

Yes — the model that produced the text doesn't matter. Every reference is checked against the scholarly record itself.

Does it catch real papers cited with wrong details?

Yes. Those surface as mismatch with a field-level diff showing exactly which element (year, authors, venue, title) disagrees with the authoritative record.

Is there a limit on list length?

No. Paste your entire bibliography or upload the PDF — there are no character caps and no account requirement.

What should I do when a reference comes back "not found"?

Treat it as unverified, not necessarily fake: very recent papers and non-scholarly sources (blogs, model cards) may be absent from the databases. Search the title manually; if you can't find it anywhere, ask the AI for the source — or remove the claim.